Companies Brace For Tax Ramifications

The founder of ADM Tronics passed off control of his company to his son Andre DiMino in 2001. ADM Tronics is a medical device company that has never laid off a single employee; now that will change.

“These people are like family with us,” he said.

DiMino won’t be able to hold out much longer. As of January 1, 2013 an Obamacare-tied tax specific to his industry will go into effect; while the Obama administration has dismissed the impact, DiMino calls it “devastating.”

ADM prepares for Obamacare tax layoffs

“I think after all of these decades of not laying people off, I think we may have to face that,” DiMino said, predicting he might have to immediately lay off three people in his manufacturing division and possibly more after that.

DiMino, whose Bergen County, N.J., business currently employs 20 workers, is one of hundreds of CEOs across the country clamoring for Washington’s attention, urging lawmakers to kill the tax before it kills jobs.

In just the last few days, the intense lobbying push elicited some measure of response. On Monday, 18 Democratic senators and senators-elect asked Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid to delay the tax, citing the business impact. They noted the industry employs more than 400,000 people, and is dealing with “significant uncertainty and confusion.”

Many in the industry, though, have been clear-eyed about what the tax means — preemptive layoffs and significant cutbacks in research and development.


Obamacare Taxes Will Slow Innovation

Lev Melinyshyn, president of Uresil, another medical device firm said, “We’ve literally put all of our new product development on hold … so we can afford to pay the stupid tax.”

These medical devices both save lives and make many lives far easier for millions. Why would the Democrats want to punish everyone? The obvious answer is to gain revenue they can spend on liberal boondoggles like Solyndra.

While DiMino is waiting for next year to see if he’ll need to fire workers, at Uresil the layoffs have already started. The company laid off six people from its 52-person workforce this year, “primarily related” to the tax according to Lev Melinyshyn.

“We had never laid off anybody,” Melinyshyn said. “We bought the company in 2004, never had a layoff. In fact, even during the recession, we added jobs. … It wasn’t until this tax hit us that we had to do it.”

Melinyshyn, whose company makes specialized catheters, said he thinks that at current staffing levels, his 46-person company can handle the tax; however, he’s expecting to cut back sharply on product development, which hurts everyone in the long run.

“A lot of patients, I think, are not going to benefit from new technologies,” he said. “We’ve literally put all of our new product development on hold … so we can afford to pay the stupid tax.”

The Affordable Care Act imposed the 2.3 percent tax on medical devices with the goal of raising nearly $30 billion over the next decade. Manufacturers say the impact of the tax is far greater than meets the eye — the 2.3 percent tax is on gross sales, meaning it’s a much greater percentage of net income.

Melinyshyn, for instance, said his total tax burden on profits will rise from 43 percent to 65 percent next year.

Illinois-based Vitalcor suggested lawmakers should at least carve out an exemption for small companies and start-ups.

However the big guys are suffering too.

Michigan-based Stryker Corporation, a company of 20,000 people, last year announced it was laying off 1,000 workers in anticipation of the tax — and a $100 million bill in the first year. The company remains concerned about the tax.

“We would rather put this money towards jobs, innovation, clinical research and priorities that will create value-added medical technology for patients while helping us partner with hospitals to deliver cost effective solutions,” CEO Kevin A. Lobo said in a statement.

The Advanced Medical Technology Association estimates that the tax ultimately could cost up to 43,000 jobs.

The White House earlier this year threatened to veto a House bill that would have repealed the tax, citing concerns that the House proposal would offset the lost revenue from the tax by cutting down on subsidies for some families.

The industry, though, argues Congress could always negotiate a different way to pay for the repeal.

DiMino said some of the damage has already been felt, not just from layoffs, but from investors “running away” from the industry.

“They know we’re being targeted,” he said.

This article Includes material provided by FoxNews


Subscribe to Mr. Kaplan’s articles at
Read Mr. Kaplan’s blog at Conservatively Speaking
Email Mr. Kaplan at
Join Mr. Kaplan on Facebook at ConservativelySpeaking
Follow Mr. Kaplan’s tweets at ConsSpeaking